June 19, 2009

Not really the Ten Commandments, but...

Somewhere between throwing a dart and coming up with a crazy list of criteria needed for reviewing online GIS web applications, I suppose it's time to show you where I'm coming from.

I'm bored of this:
and believe it or not, there is still a LOT of them out there.

But then again, there are some gorgeous sites out there as well with tons of functionality, new designs, colors that typical color-blind GIS people didn't put together... sites that are interesting and pleasing to the eye.

Is t
hat so hard to ask?!?

Throughout this blog I'll commend or criticize based on a number of factors:


1. Overall look and feel of the site

- Does it look pleasing to the eye or more like a dog's breakfast?
- Do the colors actually blend and match well or have they been put together by the same person in your office who also works on the flattening divisor defining a WGS-84 projection?
- Does it share the same common threads, values, color schemes, etc. as the corporate image? Or are you a one-off renegade department that has always wanted to stick-it-to-the-man by having your own identity? And if so, does it work?

2. Overall purpose of the site

- Is this a GIS website because your boss told you that "our department needs one"?

- Is this a GIS website because your ESRI Account Manager sold you on ArcIMS 10 years ago?
- Does it actually serve a purpose? Is there something beyond the simple point, click and “hey look - there's my house!!!” or “oooh… aerial photos”?

3. Data

- Is this 100% of your own data or are you also jumping on the bandwagon and using Google Maps? That’s fine – but is it more than just pin pricks on a map?

- Anyway to download / consume the data in any other way? Any instructions for that?
- Metadata? Ever heard of it?

4. Usability of the site


- Who is the audience?
- If the general public, is there *good* online help to guide people through the site?

- If specialist GIS folk, is there *good*
online help to guide people through the site?
- Is it a typical pan/zoom/identify site or do you roll differently and make every user go to the help because you make the zoom buttons different ‘just to be different’
- Is this a web mapping site or a GIS site? Do you know the difference?

5. Geek entities:

- Do you mention what’s running in the backroom powering this site? Do you care? Some people do and scream from their soapbox and some people don’t. I like knowing what is behind the scenes just like any other GIS geek.

6. Speed / Reliability
:

- Suggestion from a comment and I was going to put this on (and did mention it Twitter) but forgot to blog it. Speed is a huge factor in GIS web applications. People want their maps and they want them now! Nothing I hate more than watching a demo at a conference and the map just grinding away. I think about the poor guy at the local County office on a slow pipe trying to squeeze their maps through the firewall ...

- Reliability is a big question as well - I've seen plenty a website throw up Java Script errors left, right and center.
What else do you look for in a GIS Web Application?

4 comments:

  1. Hey, great idea for a blog, very interesting, there are so many things to look for in a good GIS web app. You've hit a lot of good ones, but what about speed!? This is a huge one for me and something I love about google maps and similar sites as opposed to IMS sites...do you cache or hit the server for data? I hate waiting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Anon

    You are completely right - speed is a huge factor, as is reliability / bugs, etc. I'll keep this "Criteria" post live, so we can add to it over time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really appreciate your critiquing various GIS sites. I'm interested in what you find across the web. I was looking at your profile and noticed that you don't say much about yourself. What are your credentials and experience in GIS that gives you a background from which to review these sites?

    ReplyDelete
  4. When one is reviewing the work of others it can be beneficial to hide behind the curtain of anonymity. From my perspective, I am not worried about the credentials of the author of this blog: GIS Web Maps. This blog will be successful or not depending upon the knowledge and creativity that the author brings to the table. Thus far he/she has walked the walk while talking the talk.

    I am more interested in content than in pedigrees. I say review and write away. Your audience is watching... ;)

    ReplyDelete